Gender and the Election
Or
Democracy Inaction
By
Phil LaMancusa
Who would you prefer to lead you into battle:
Genghis Khan or Genghis Mom? This is going to be a classic type of question
that you’ll be asked during this election cycle, make no mistake about it. Not
whether you want to go into battle, who started the war or why it is being
fought. It’s a typical tactical ploy called ‘smoke and mirrors’ used in any
patriarchal society where struggles for power occur; to divert you from
considering underlying issues; cloud the issue, who’s better at doing most anything at all, a man or a woman? Who
gets your vote?
. Challenges
like these will come completely out of left field, distractions to keep you
from getting to the meat of any matter; and yes, we are in a patriarchal
society (as is most of the rest of the word) and we’re mired in it. Patriarchal
societies run the world whether we like it or not. Why ‘mired’? To be mired in
something means to be stuck, jammed, caught, held. The fact that patriarchal societies are based
on fear, domination, oppression, sexism, specie-ism, age-ism and power is a
form of mire. I’m against being mired in those things.
Politics
have long been considered a man’s game and to go up against that a woman needs
to buck that system. It’s all about masculinity being a leadership quality and
prerequisite. In a patriarchal society men’s masculinity is regularly being
challenged by bullies, and women are regarded as trophies at most and chattel
at the least, to rise up in that system a woman has to face off to criticism
that’s based on her gender.
Now,
I’m not taking sides here regarding which candidate that you should vote for;
I’m questioning simply: does gender play a part in political elections? That
question cannot be answered without answering other questions first. Do any
women besides Hillary Clinton and Claire Underwood want to hold public
office? Would bigger funding sources
want to take a chance on a woman who’s running for office? Are women capable of
holding office? Are women smart enough, focused enough, strong, decisive,
grounded and able to make tough choices enough to serve the citizens of this
great country and at the same time be representative of the most powerful
nation on earth? Are they ruthless, trustworthy and courageous? I know, those
are silly questions; and yet, you’re going to be asked them this fall to
influence your vote.
Okay,
here’s some numbers: 51% of the population are women but there’s only 17% in
congress, 20% average across the board in politics nationally. When it comes to
schooling, 33% are more likely to earn a degree and women are far more likely
to graduate; however very few seek a career in politics. Is it possible that
women have been shown that their way professionally, in a patriarchy, is preferably
in the nurturing fields like healthcare, teaching and making homes for their
families and their…men.
Men
have it all over women. Men are born privileged, are raised to be ready for action
and geared to win in everything that is competitive, and it’s part of their
birthright to lead. Competition is great among men in big things like war,
sports, politics, and women are relegated in a support capacity as nurses,
secretaries and Girl Fridays. When a man exercises his sexual prowess he’s
considered a stud; a woman doing the same dance is said to be a slut, when he
fires someone, he’s tough; she’s a bitch. This is nothing new; these are called
‘gender (bashing) pronouns’, beware of them in election campaigns and debates.
I
exercise my voting rights in every election that I can participate in; time was---when
I couldn’t decide on a candidate that I wanted elected---I would merely vote in
my party and for whatever woman was running, rationalizing that ‘men have
screwed things up for so long that it was only fair to give a woman a shot’. A
woman I know straightened me out by pointing out women that had been elected
that were just as inept, unprofessional and dishonest as men in the same
positions. Now if I don’t like any of the candidates, I don’t vote for any one,
unless it’s to vote for the lesser of two evils or idiots. Am I going to vote
in this election? Maybe not in every category; at this point I’m not jazzed
about many of the choices.
The
question is: will the American public (you) be swayed by a candidate’s gender?
Voting for a woman simply because they are a woman is as wrong as voting for a
man because of his gender; that’s stupid and that’s trouble. It is a fact that
men get more credibility for their statements than women do--- even if they’re
stating the same fact. So think about it, can you pick a candidate because of
their qualifications alone? I know, I know, the whole process is rigged from
the gate; leave that one at the door for a moment; the mature logic has it that
as you decide on either of these two (or more) that are running this fall, you
will (I should hope) want to make an intelligent, rational choice. Or will you
be swayed by gender pronoun rhetoric?
Did
you watch all of the debates, both parties? That would have been a great start.
Did you watch the primaries? Does theater get any better than that? These are
the scenarios that will occur, and you will witness, in the presidential race
this fall in the year 2016: There’s Mr. T bullying his way to the front,
belittling, scoffing, ridiculing and making up a whole lot of stuff; the gang
leader, the pool bully, the sandbox lout and… it works! He’ll build a wall,
deport the rapists, keep out the terrorists, bring back more wealth for the
rich and let the poor have what they deserve…nothing! He’s the one for me!
And
then there’s Mrs. C. with the whole political machine in her pocket, using all
the skill and experience at rhetoric, debate and political savvy it takes to
field questions like Serena Williams and dodge issues and topics like her
attention span was Teflon and the subjects have no relevance to what her
talking points happen to be. She showed the country that bucking the
establishment and criticizing big banks and the wealthy doesn’t count for a
hill of Bernies when the system that you want to change has and is in power.
She’s one smart cookie! I want her for president!
The
fact is that I don’t relish either one of them being the person that leads us into
battle, and one of them certainly will. We will, once again, play the power
game in the worldwide patriarchal system and arm our young people to go and
fight wars that are for economic gain and power. Land areas will be decimated
and collateral damage will include the young and the innocent, all in the name
of peace and prosperity. Here’s the real question; when your child comes home
in a flag covered box, who do you want to call them ‘heroic’ and give you a big
old hug: an old letch with a comb over or a dowager in a pants suit? If you answered Morgan Freeman… you missed the
whole point.